Simon Templar

Joined

• started 18 topics
• posted 93 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Simon Templar

• 
  12

  Is there a Ministerial Servant Qualification Change?

  by Simon Templar in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it used to be that if an adult child (either a non-believer or disfellowshiped/disassociated) lived "under your roof" and lived by the "bible standards of the home", the father could be appointed either a ms or elder as the case may be.

  of course, if the adult child was a believer and a member of the congregation, they had to be exemplary.

  i overheard at the meeting yesterday, taking place in a side conversation held in the corner, that if this living condition exists, the father cannot be appointed because of the presence of the non-participating adult child in the home.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  Steve2 it was a conversation between two Elders talking on the side. I was doing light cleaning. It was not from the platform.
• 
  12

  Is there a Ministerial Servant Qualification Change?

  by Simon Templar in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it used to be that if an adult child (either a non-believer or disfellowshiped/disassociated) lived "under your roof" and lived by the "bible standards of the home", the father could be appointed either a ms or elder as the case may be.

  of course, if the adult child was a believer and a member of the congregation, they had to be exemplary.

  i overheard at the meeting yesterday, taking place in a side conversation held in the corner, that if this living condition exists, the father cannot be appointed because of the presence of the non-participating adult child in the home.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  It used to be that if an adult child (either a non-believer or disfellowshiped/disassociated) lived "under your roof" and lived by the "bible standards of the home", the father could be appointed either a MS or elder as the case may be. Of course, if the adult child was a believer and a member of the congregation, they had to be exemplary. I overheard at the meeting yesterday, taking place in a side conversation held in the corner, that if this living condition exists, the father cannot be appointed because of the presence of the non-participating adult child in the home. I can't ask any questions to clarify this matter for obvious reasons. Has anyone heard anything similar? Is there a letter or some published information about this?
• 
  17

  Just curious

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i remember that every time when my father and i came home from the meeting, my mother (who stayed at home for my disabled brother) asked us "who was attending and who wasn't attending".. and then, we took some time to drink coffee and went through the list who was there and who wasn't.

  there after there was an opinion made why someone was absent and what this meant in relation with his strength of believe.. just curious, do you recognize this?

  gorby.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  It was, and still is done all the time. It is part of the learned self-righteousness. When I was a kid, I remember hearing from the platform that we should note who wasn't there and check on them to see if they are alright.
• 
  112

  Did an EX-JW wake you up to TTATT or did you put the effort to wake up yourself?

  by John Aquila in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  how many of us were woken up by some apostate yelling false prophets at a convention?.

  how many of us were woken up by someone holding a sign and yelling, what happened to 1975.

  how many of us were coerced to investigate the wt because some ex-jw pulled up a bunch of old watchtowers magazines and told us to read the false predictions?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  I realized that something was wrong when 1) The CO was a thug. When he visited the congregation he cornered the sisters, picked up gossip and their ideas about who and what were wrong and then went on a spree investigating things (improperly) and persecuting the BOE. Not the way it was to be from the Watchtower/KM and assembly/convention talks I heard. 2) The BOE fought with one another, didn't follow the rules, manifested blatant incompetency, demonstrated so much wrong personally and organizationally that a little voice in my head said "what's going on here". I started researching things based on the conduct of the CO, BOE and a sister who yelled at me, gave me orders of what to do and wouldn't speak to me at the Meetings. The BOE did nothing about it. I realized something is "wrong with this picture" and it isn't me. Then I started researching things on the internet and hard copy. That was 10-12 years ago. I am still for various reasons that I wont go into now. In my view, they brought it on themselves.
• 
  32

  Impressions of the Governing Body; who's smart, who ain't?

  by Room 215 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  based on what we've seen, it seems to me that of the seven, splane and jackson are the smartest; herd, lett and morris the least intelligent; and sanderson and losch somewhere in the middle.

  .

  what's your impression?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  They are all very "street smart" and able to read the politics of the organization at any given time. That's how they got where they are. Don't sell them short.
• 
  22

  Overlapping generation pushed me to the brink

  by Anator in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hello, i haven't posted for a number of years.

  i've been struggling for years of wrestling in my mind regarding the organization.

  i guess the big thing for me to push me over the edge is the generation overlapping thingy.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  Its a problem for many. I have been in the truth since the 1950's. I lived through 1975, and numerous changes in doctrine/understandings through the years. Its a struggle for me and most of the people sitting at the meeting filling a chair. Don't feel alone. If you speak to a Brother about your concerns, they will tell you this is new light and the problem is with you. Hang in there.
• 
  14

  What I said to an Elder and the matter was dropped.

  by Simon Templar in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i decided to tell this small story.. about 25 years ago, we lived in a certain area in the usa and associated with the local congregation there.

  coincidently, one of the elders was the assistant congregation servant in a different kh and congregation which i grew up in.

  therefore, we knew one another well.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  I decided to tell this small story.

  About 25 Years ago, we lived in a certain area in the USA and associated with the local congregation there. Coincidently, one of the Elders was the Assistant Congregation Servant in a different KH and Congregation which I grew up in. Therefore, we knew one another well. He was a maverick of sorts, an abrasive odd-ball and did what he wanted. He is still alive today but very, very old. We no longer live in that area so its safe to talk about in my opinion.

  Approximately 4-5 years after moving to this Congregation, the Elder that I knew took me aside, alone in the back of the KH, and asked me a question. The question was about my conduct which would have been a JC offense, and asked me point blank if I did this thing. I looked at him and said: "Who told you that?" He answered; "I cant tell you". I replied: "If you can't reply, neither can I. I don't entertain or respond to anonymous accusations". By the way, this accusation was absolutely false, and it made me angry.

  The Brother looked sheepish and walked away without saying another word. The matter was never brought-up again. It died a quick death that night. I was later appointed in that Congregation. The question I was asked and the total experience I had that evening led me to begin questioning things. If he never bothered me with that false accusation, I wouldn't have been awakened at that time.

  My point is that the religion is filled with real experiences of baseless accusations and the persecution of innocent people. I know of several other actual experiences like this and worse, but wont bother anyone with them now. Everyone must have them also.
• 
  9

  Has appointment of MS and Elder been changed?

  by Simon Templar in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  are there any changes to the new procedure?

  it seems to me that the co doesn't ask the candidate questions any longer.

  they just decide who they will appoint and announce it at the next weekly meeting.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  Tazemanian-devil and Sir 82.

  Thanks for the information. I trust your input.

  I have been watching this and are fairly close with some recent appointees. It appears to me that recently (past year) the CO says nothing, the Elders say nothing and the announcement is merely read the following week, or the CO assigns two brothers to ask the question after he is gone. I think they are jumping at the chance to reappoint former Elders (we have several). They push them all the time. The COs target them and try and get close. Something is going on I think.
• 
  9

  Has appointment of MS and Elder been changed?

  by Simon Templar in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  are there any changes to the new procedure?

  it seems to me that the co doesn't ask the candidate questions any longer.

  they just decide who they will appoint and announce it at the next weekly meeting.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  Are there any changes to the new procedure? It seems to me that the CO doesn't ask the candidate questions any longer. They just decide who they will appoint and announce it at the next weekly meeting. Are they still trying to reappoint brothers who stopped serving, or has that idea gone away?
• 
  64

  Shutting down the Judicial Committee "invite".

  by kairos in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  judicial committee invitation comes, with be there or be square consequences.. ( come or we will df you ).

  what are the sure fire, tested and true tactics that will keep the elders off your back?

  ( for good ).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Simon Templar

  Here is what I would do. If I received a telephone call, I would ask to receive a written letter on the subject of meeting. Previously, I would have identified a local Lawyer who would work with me on matters such as this for a reasonable fee (they are around). I would give the letter to the Lawyer to answer. The answer that I would want is something like this: "Pursuant to your letter to Mr/Ms X dated XXXXX requesting a meeting, please be advised that I will be representing Mr/Ms X in this matter and he/she will not be in attendance. Unfortunately, I cannot meet with you on the day and time indicated in your letter. Please advise me of an alternate day and time that you would like to meet. I will appear at that time and we can pursue resolution of your questions. Please direct all future communications related to this subject to me via the contact information provided on this letter."

  I am sure that the BOE will be instructed by the legal Dep't to drop the matter and not pursue. The BOE will also be afraid to say anything other than hello to you. At this point you are free not to return to the KH, or attend as you wish and not be bothered by the matter any longer as long as you keep your mouth shut and don't force their hand.

  Nobody likes dealing with Lawyers/Law suits and the time and expense that goes along with it even if the Law suits are not real but just a possibility. The WTB&TS doesn't want to spend $$$ dealing with the legal cost of investigating and prosecuting personal indiscretions which do not threaten the congregation as a whole.